EXO-CBX Files Police Complaint Against SM Executives For Fraud

https://www.jazminemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/sm-sues-EXO.jpg

EXO members Chen, Baekhyun, and Xiumin (hereafter referred to as EXO-CBX) have filed a lawsuit against SM Entertainment executives for fraud.

A representative from INB100, the agency of EXO-CBX, stated to Maeil Business Star Today on the 26th of June, “Yesterday, we filed a lawsuit against SM’s CEO Lee Seong-su and co-CEO Tak Young-joon at Seoul Seongdong Police Station for fraud under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Economic Crimes.”

According to EXO-CBX, SM promised to apply a commission rate of 5.5% for the distribution of albums and digital music by Kakao, but failed to fulfill this promise. They also claimed that SM took advantage of EXO-CBX’s individual activities to capture 10% of their sales revenue as royalty.

The conflict between EXO-CBX and SM dates back to about a year ago. When EXO-CBX notified SM of the termination of their exclusive contracts due to issues such as non-disclosure of settlement data in June last year, SM claimed that external forces had approached the artists with unfair intentions.

The conflict seemed to be resolved when SM and EXO-CBX issued a joint statement stating, “There were misunderstandings about the involvement of third-party external forces,” and announced plans to promote EXO’s activities more vigorously and continuously through discussions and modifications of the contract.

EXO-CBX established the independent label INB100 in January this year, and agreed to continue EXO’s activities under SM, while individual and team activities of EXO-CBX would be carried out under the independent label INB100.

However, the conflict reignited when EXO-CBX held a press conference on the 10th of this month, exposing that SM did not keep its promise regarding the commission rate for album and digital music distribution, and only demanded 10% royalty for individual activities revenue.

SEE ALSO: The Timeline Of EXO-CBX and SM Entertainment Legal Battle

In response, SM stated, “Our exclusive contract with EXO-CBX is still valid,” and “we allowed individual activities through personal corporations, and EXO-CBX agreed to pay 10% of their individual corporation sales according to the agreement,” emphasizing that the contract should be fulfilled.

Source: (A)

What do you think of this?

Whats your reaction to this article?
+1
0
+1
0
+1
1
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0

Other stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.